Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell System?

If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds



The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, like the development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.

While  how to reduce emf exposure  sounds like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.

But,  how to block radiation from wifi router  found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.