Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.

However, because  how to protect yourself from 5g  transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.


While this sounds like something that's good however, those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further far from antennas.

But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As  how to block radiation from wifi router , they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.